Think back to 2019. Launching a Web3 project then wasn’t just a product sprint — it was like assembling a space shuttle blindfolded. You needed a Solidity magician to tame the EVM, a full-stack wizard versed in cryptic repo structures, an AWS whisperer who could conjure infrastructure from YAML files, and a support angel with saint-like patience to explain why MetaMask had vanished yet again.
It was messy.
It was costly.
It was heroic — and often tragic.
Back then, this complexity wasn’t a flaw. It was simply how things were. Web3 was an untamed wilderness: no standards, no reliable SDKs, no common UX patterns. Just a raw frontier where the only rule was “build fast and pray your contracts don’t get rekt.”
And yet, from this chaos emerged something essential: a myth.
The myth that launching in Web3 requires deep technical expertise. That great products must begin with great engineers. That delivering value means shipping code.
Fast forward to 2025 — and that myth is cracking.
It’s a quiet tragedy, repeated in hundreds of Discord servers and dev chats: a team ships a “minimal” product after six months of building, with custom smart contracts, pixel-perfect UI, and tokenomics designed by a former McKinsey consultant.
And then? Nothing. No sign-ups. No traction. No feedback — just the hollow echo of a landing page visit. It didn’t fail because of code. It failed because of the question it never asked. An MVP is not a product. It’s not a tool. It’s not a launchpad for hype.
It’s a test.
A question in product form. Something that asks the user: “Would you care enough to do this — right now — without me convincing you?”
But most MVPs in Web3 aren’t tests. They’re showcases. They’re built to impress investors, not users.
They’re designed to say “look what we can do,” not “here’s what we’ve learned.”
And the moment you shift from exploration to exhibition — you’ve lost.
These aren’t theories. These are patterns — gathered from 50+ projects we’ve seen firsthand.
| Failure mode | What it looks like | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Overbuilding | Too many features in V1 | Founder is scared to focus |
| No feedback loop | Waiting for audits, mainnet, or investors before showing users | You’re optimizing for safety, not learning |
| Abstract value | Product solves for “Web3 vision” but not a real pain | Solution in search of a problem |
| Token obsession | Utility token design before user activity | Cart before horse. Economics without behavior. |
| Passive surfaces | MVP is just a deck, a whitepaper, or a static site | No user action = no data = no learning |
If your MVP can’t fail, it can’t teach you anything.
That’s what you’re actually building. Not a Minimum Viable Product. A Minimum Learning Vehicle. Something that:
Instead of a feature list, ask yourself:
“What am I trying to find out?”
And: “What’s the fastest way to get that answer from a real user?”
This shift — from building to discovering — is what separates great founders from code tourists.
Before we help launch anything, we ask these five:
If we can’t answer yes to all five — we’re still too early.
There’s a moment — usually around week two of building — when every first-time Web3 founder stares at a Figma wireframe and wonders: “Should I be hiring a Solidity dev right now?”
The answer, 90% of the time, is: no.
What you should be doing is assembling your startup like a hacker assembles a mixtape — pulling from existing parts, stitching together insights, and getting to a working demo before your coffee goes cold.
In 2025, the smartest builders are not coders. They’re composers. They know the instruments. But more importantly — they know which not to play.
We’ve worked with dozens of early-stage founders. Here’s what their real stack looks like:
| Function | Tools we recommend |
|---|---|
| Wallet integration | Onez White-Label Wallet, RainbowKit |
| Smart contract logic | ThirdWeb, OpenZeppelin Contracts |
| Frontend | Webflow, Framer, Retool |
| Backend | Supabase, Firebase, Airtable |
| Feedback & iteration | Tally, Notion, Telegram |
We’re not talking about makeshift tools. These are the same stacks used by top accelerators and YC-backed teams.
Forget the ego-driven dichotomy of “in-house vs outsourced.” The real question is: How much are you trying to learn — and how fast?
| Strategy | Cost | Speed | Risk | Best Used For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Build | $$$$$ | Slow | High | Custom infra, protocols, unique logic |
| Buy (SDK) | $$ | Fast | Low | Validating product-market fit |
| Borrow | $ | Instant | Low | Pre-demo, community testing, traction |
The wallet is the first real point of contact between your product and crypto reality. If that touchpoint sucks — everything else falls apart. That’s why most of our MVPs start with a white-label wallet from Onez:
Nobody cares what wallet your user logs in with — until they can’t. So give them something that just works. And move on to what matters.
Every startup has a moment when it either becomes real — or disappears into pitch-deck purgatory.
One of our most surprising projects started with a single Telegram message: “Can we get a working Web3 wallet live in three weeks?”
The founder was sharp. Experienced in fintech. Had a clear thesis: mobile-first crypto adoption in emerging markets is under-served. But he had no dev team, no product, no solidity repo. Just an insight, a deck, and urgency.
We said yes — on one condition: we don’t build for him. We build with him.
Instead of starting with features, we started with outcomes. What should the user be able to do — and feel — after onboarding? Answer: onboard without confusion, send stablecoins, and track simple savings goals. No jargon. No wallet-switching.
We used:
The entire clickable flow was built in days — not months.
He invited 12 users from his Telegram group. 7 completed onboarding. 5 sent a transaction. 3 replied with questions we hadn’t anticipated — gold for iteration.
With 3 updated flows, a narrative built from real friction, and working wallet UI — he demoed to investors.
No stealth. No alpha list. Just clarity and motion.
If you can’t show what your product does in under 30 seconds — it doesn’t exist yet.
This case is anonymized under NDA, but it’s not unique. We’ve seen variations of this same story play out again and again. When founders start with users, use composable tools, and commit to learning — things move.
There’s a myth that haunts new founders: that without engineers, you can’t build anything real. But here’s the truth we’ve seen — again and again:
The strongest early products aren’t built by the best coders. They’re built by the clearest thinkers.
Web3 is noisy. It’s full of complexity for the sake of complexity. But clarity is still undefeated. You don’t need to raise before you build. You don’t need to build before you test. You don’t need a team before you have a truth.
What you need is:
And when you have those — you can move faster than teams 5x your size.
Before you ship anything, ask:
We’ve helped dozens of early-stage founders go from idea to traction:
If you’re serious about shipping your MVP:
No, not initially. With modern no-code and low-code tools, you can validate your idea and build an MVP without a technical team. However, as your project grows and requires custom features, you may want to bring technical expertise on board.
The cost varies depending on the tools you choose, but typically ranges from $50-500/month for basic infrastructure. This is significantly less than hiring a development team, which could cost $20,000+ per month.
With the right tools and focused effort, you can have a working prototype in 2-4 weeks. As demonstrated in our case study, even a functional wallet MVP can be built in 21 days.
The main risks include:
However, these risks are often outweighed by the benefits of faster market validation and reduced initial investment.
Consider transitioning when:
Most recommended tools are battle-tested and security-audited. However, always do due diligence, start with small deployments, and gradually scale as you build confidence in the infrastructure.
Discover the key differences between Web3 and traditional startups, from decentralized governance to tokenomics. Learn how blockchain technology is reshaping…
Discover how to build a successful Web3 project with our comprehensive GTM strategy guide. Learn key metrics, proven tactics, and…
Discover the key differences between Web3 accelerators and marketing agencies to make the right choice for your blockchain startup. Learn…
Discover actionable approaches like storytelling, social media, and influencer collaborations to promote your NFT project
Discover how Web3 transforms digital branding with NFTs, Metaverse, and decentralized strategies. Learn from successful brands building authentic community connections…
Discover how modern startups can leverage powerful digital marketing tools to compete with industry giants. From analytics and automation to…
This website uses cookies.